On 1/12/06, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If FAT patent is upheld, then I guess FAT support has to be removed. > I think the patents in question are only to do with simultaneously supporting 8.3 filenames and long filenames. If that's correct then we would only have to remove that particular part of the code (if that functionality even exists on Linux vfat) since it's not really needed anyway. n0dalus. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
