FAT patent uphelp, now what?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: FAT patent uphelp, now what?
From: Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:09:45 -0500
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/0.9.92

If FAT patent is upheld, then I guess FAT support has to be removed.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAT patent uphelp, now what?
  - From: n0dalus
- Re: FAT patent uphelp, now what?
  - From: Paul F. Johnson

Prev by Date: Re: Extra CDs packages installation gone in firstboot?
Next by Date: Re: FAT patent uphelp, now what?
Previous by thread: Extra CDs packages installation gone in firstboot?
Next by thread: Re: FAT patent uphelp, now what?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux