On 1/9/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not just yet, my time has been largely consumed of late.
Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>>>>>
>>>> Other system configuration tools are more suited to do the basic
>>>> functionality and not expose a lot of details. You could do it in a
>>>> more comprehensive way but the UI should be designed to do the
>>>> basic things in an easy way first
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Care to present me with some easily observed examples so that I
>>> could better apply what you're suggesting to my problem?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure. system-config-httpd only exposes basic functionality for
>> example. GUI applications shouldnt be designed with the aim to expose
>> all the configuration options but as task based systems. Figuring out
>> what options fit into which task group would be a good idea. Try
>> create some mockups using glade.
>> regards
>> Rahul
>>
> Will do.
Any followups on this one?
Not just yet, my time has been largely consumed of late.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play with Penguins.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
