Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Other system configuration tools are more suited to do the basic
functionality and not expose a lot of details. You could do it in a
more comprehensive way but the UI should be designed to do the
basic things in an easy way first
Care to present me with some easily observed examples so that I
could better apply what you're suggesting to my problem?
Sure. system-config-httpd only exposes basic functionality for
example. GUI applications shouldnt be designed with the aim to expose
all the configuration options but as task based systems. Figuring out
what options fit into which task group would be a good idea. Try
create some mockups using glade.
regards
Rahul
Will do.
Any followups on this one?
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list