On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 02:10 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > There is no anti 3 party repository stance in the sense that there is > nothing in the formal Fedora repositories working actively against them. > If there are bugs in any of the packages within core they should fixed > regardless of the 3rd party repositories which may have helped uncovered > the problem. In other words they are just routine bugs addressed in > bugzilla. No big board of (anti) cooperation required. There have been cases where Extras has used a different naming scheme than the third parties - I'm not sure how many though. The extras review process is open though, and I don't know that it was ever done despite requests from the third parties against it. Nor do I think Extras should be obligated to follow third party naming schemes, not if doing so would violate the explicit extras naming scheme. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
