On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 20:34 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > Oh yes, it did: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-January/msg01826.html > > Maybe it doesn't anymore, but for good manners everytime a yum release > comes up and mentiones bugs fixed I run and distribute it to ATrpms > folks and they are *happy* about it. Especially the ones running FC > older then the latest, that doesn't get any yum problems fixed > anymore. Wouldn't the right thing to do be to push to get stuff like this fixed in Fedora, rather than happily replacing a core package with your own at the slightest provocation? (And to Fedora developers, you should also be receptive to accepting bug fixes like this in a timely manner...)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
