On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 05:17:02PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:49 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Er, or just volunteer to package mythtv for livna? That is the second time this suggestion comes up in this thread. What makes livna and ATrpms different, or say livna preferable to ATrpms in this context? At the beginning of this thread some people posted about livna replacing packages just as well. Just for the note: Fedora itself, when it wasn't merged with RHL (aka fedora.us) decided to have vendor packages replaced. packages like shadow-utils or rpm itself. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpd1BgV3xW1H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
