Re: ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:

If so, is there any redhat.com folk that would be willing to add
versioned obsoletes/provides to core specfiles? That's neccessary to
ensure upgradability.

They (redhat folk) have been receptive to Versioning previously non-versioned Obsoletes/Provides in the past when I've requested it on several occasions.

However, if you're asking in the context "will they add these simply to be compatible/upgradable with ATrpms", then I bet the proposition will be less well-received.

-- Rex

Please don't make this into a political thing. Axel provides a great service to the Redhat/Fedora user community. Lets have a discussion about the technicalities, and just do it.

Can I assume we're looking for solutions that also help DAG, Dries, Livna ?

John


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux