On 12/30/05, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 08:34:36AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > So would third party repository maintainers consider Fedora Core > > having protectbase by enabled acceptable?. > > I think the thread's consensus is that this would not benefit anyone > as much as it puts pain to the 3rd party folks (maintainers and > users). Yep. I mean, it's not to say the plugin is bunk. But, having it on by default causes an extra burden of support on both sides: core and "alternatives". A user activating it means that they know what they're doing, requiring much less support. -- -jeff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
