On 12/29/05, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Exactly. Which is why any repo, be it atrpms or something else, that > does see a need to replace package foo in core, and thus has > overlapping package sets with core will not like this idiom. I have > already been hit by bug reports that stem from improper use of > priorities/weights and scores. Such filtering creates a lot more > issues and debugging problems than it solves. let's be clear.... if protectbase plugin was turned on by default would atrpm leave it enabled on client system or would you attempt to disable the plugin via package scriptlet action? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
