Hi, > Rhythmbox uses gstreamer, it would be gstreamer that uses the plugin. > Rhythmbox does not link against the plugin, does not require the plugin, > etc. For that matter - neither does gstreamer. > > I don't think there would be a legal problem. > If there was - can I use my X11 server which is MIT to display an emacs > window? What about emacs opening an X11 window? You're talking about something that is MIT vs. something that is GPL or LGPL - I don't think your analogy would tell us anything. But even if X11 would be GPL or LGPL - interaction with the X server is done through the X protocol. Interpretation of the "linking to" language in GPL and LGPL varies, but most parties agree that it boils down to "does the code at runtime execute in the same execution space". In practice, this means "dynamic or static linking". So if X were GPL/LGPL, and you had a binary application talking to it, that would be fine as long as the libX11 used to implement the protocol is MIT or similar. > I don't see a difference between that and rhythmbox using gstreamer > (lgp) which talks to this plugin. There really is. If you are interested, read http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/documentation/licensing.html Thomas Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/ <-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*-> Don't change your name keep it the same for fear I may lose you again I know you won't it's just that I am unorganized and I want to find you when Something good happens <-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*-> URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
