Elliot Lee wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote: > > > Just to make sure I follow you - this only applies to the binaries, > > correct ? We both agree that patent law does not stop you from shipping > > source code that implements patented techniques ? > > Even this is questionable. It depends a lot on what constitutes patent > infringement. Wikipedia sez "In U.S. law, an infringement may occur where > the defendant has made, used, sold, offered to sell, or imported the > infringing invention or its equivalent." Because software patents, such as > the MP3 ones, typically claim a "method by which X happens", the source > code could be argued to be the equivalent of the invention described in > the MP3 patents' claims. Form doesn't seem to be important in patent law, > only function - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_equivalents > > I think a lot of this discussion here consists of us trying to be patent > lawyers when we're not. While free software hackers are generally much > more aware of IP law than your average Joe, we're just missing too much > knowledge of patent case law and general "legal flavor" to have any idea > which way this goes, legally speaking. > > I expect there will be future developments in the media formats area of > Fedora, but for now it seems unlikely that we will do more than link to > the packages you have kindly made available. > > Best, > -- Elliot > Red Hat Summit Nashville (May 30 - June 2, 2006) > http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/ > > While my view is that the patent would cover only the binary form, legal precedent suggests that the patent also covers the source form. A fine example of this would be the DVD decryption code - which has been deemed illegal in U.S. courts. As far as Fedora is concerned, this is a moot point. I can't think of any examples of entire packages that we distribute only in source form. Packages that we cannot build and distribute in binary form and that downstream cannot build and distribute (without regard to contracts) have typically been excluded and left to projects like Livna. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ -- Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
