Re: Royalty free gstreamer plug-in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 11:59 -0500, Elliot Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> 
> > Just to make sure I follow you - this only applies to the binaries,
> > correct ? We both agree that patent law does not stop you from shipping
> > source code that implements patented techniques ?
> 
> Even this is questionable.

I am not 100% sure of this either.  But there are enough examples out
there of companies doing this.  Lots of sample code available from
Intel's website for IPP can decode a whole range of patent-encumbered
formats, to give but one example.  Are they infringing by doing so ?

> I think a lot of this discussion here consists of us trying to be patent
> lawyers when we're not.

Agreed :) It just seems like it should at least get some legal review
from Red Hat lawyers instead of being dismissed out of hand.

Thomas


Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
If I say goodbye to love
will it go away ?
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux