On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > > The same information is already available in the file system's own > data structures; it shouldn't be necessary for the RAID layer to do > that for itself. _That_ kind of redundancy isn't what RAID is > supposed to be about. > > But yes, there are always band-aids which can help to improve any > design flaw. I rather like the separation between file system and raid devices. It gives more choice and makes both components simpler. Now I can choose raid1+ext2, raid5+ext3, swap+raid0 and reiser+device. I would rather like not to loose those options. Otherwise it would be like combining "uniq" & "sort", because you could make one case work better. christof -- Christof Damian christof@xxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
