On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 11:13 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > well... if the root is brand spanking new.. why would it need a sync? > > Because it _is_ brand spanking new (and thus unclean from a RAID point > of view)? but.. it might as well be marked clean. there's no information in never-used parts of the disk after all... so why sync it instead of pretending it's synced perfectly fine.... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
