Re: libusual interface [was Re: libusual and ub]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pete Zaitcev (zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > *Why* do they need the capability? Users *should not care* which
> > driver they use - if they do, one of them needs fixed.
> 
> Well, such is the theory, but in practice making an alternative driver
> to handle all cases creates an impossibly high barrier to entry.
> The common solution is to pass known-good devices from old driver to
> new driver (e.g. 8139too, e100). This is, unfortunately, impossible
> in case of USB storage.

That's what I'm asking - why is it impossible? We've turned off
things like eepro100, so I'm not sure why disabling usb-storage
for X, Y, and Z would be a problem. After all, anything left couldn't
be worse than firewire. :)

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux