Re: libusual interface [was Re: libusual and ub]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pete Zaitcev (zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 02:21:50 -0500, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I mean separate the aliases *into the base drivers themselves* - not
> > using libusual at all. i.e., a given usb id only matches one of
> > usb-storage or ub.
> 
> Nothing new in this approach either. This is how ub worked way before
> libusual, and before Adrian Bunk broke it. The problem is, users require
> a capability to switch between drivers. And we cannot predict which one
> they want to use for any given device.

*Why* do they need the capability? Users *should not care* which
driver they use - if they do, one of them needs fixed.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux