On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 18:35 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 10:07 +1100, Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > kernel-2.6.14-1.1767_FC5 > > > ------------------------ > > > * Thu Dec 15 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > - 2.6.15-rc5-git5 > > > > > > * Wed Dec 14 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > - 2.6.15-rc5-git4 > > > - Try 'optimise for size' again. > > > - Silence noisy CD drives that spew msgs when probed whilst empty. > > > > > > * Tue Dec 13 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > - 2.6.15-rc5-git3 > > > - Use MMIO instead of PIO for 8139too > > > > FC5 seems keen to get me to run the smp kernel (I'm on a uniprocessor > > machine without hyperthreading). I've noticed with this update (since > > the smp kernel runs - the one that came with the original install > > didn't) that the smp kernel seems to be noticeably slower than the > > non-smp kernel. > > Do you have a processor which supports NX (see /proc/cpuinfo). If so, > we were defaulting to installing kernel-smp for test1. Unfortunately, > that has turned up some problems and so won't be the case in test2 or > later. Yes I do. Sadly, the smp kernel is significantly slower than the non-smp kernel. (or ar least for this round it is). R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
