Re: rawhide report: 20051216 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> kernel-2.6.14-1.1767_FC5
> ------------------------
> * Thu Dec 15 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> - 2.6.15-rc5-git5
> 
> * Wed Dec 14 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> - 2.6.15-rc5-git4
> - Try 'optimise for size' again.
> - Silence noisy CD drives that spew msgs when probed whilst empty.
> 
> * Tue Dec 13 2005 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> - 2.6.15-rc5-git3
> - Use MMIO instead of PIO for 8139too

FC5 seems keen to get me to run the smp kernel (I'm on a uniprocessor
machine without hyperthreading).  I've noticed with this update (since
the smp kernel runs - the one that came with the original install
didn't) that the smp kernel seems to be noticeably slower than the
non-smp kernel.


> selinux-policy-2.1.6-4
> ----------------------
> * Wed Dec 14 2005 Dan Walsh <dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.1.5-4
> - Fixes to allow automount to use portmap
> - Fixes to start kernel in s0-s15:c0.c255

I'm not getting any of the kernels installed to boot without adding a
selinux=0 to the boot process.  I don't think this is kernel related,
but something to do with selinux.  The kernels get to the point where X
starts and the cursor appears and then nothing else happens.  Dropping
to the vt (CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE) shows the hardware initialized, and then
no further progress.


Rodd

-- 
"It's a fine line between denial and faith.
 It's much better on my side"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux