On Thursday 08 December 2005 16:59, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 23:51 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:55 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > On 12/8/05, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha <strange@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yes. Because I'm doing cache operations, not repository operations. > > > > Or rather, that's what I thought I was doing, so it would be > > > > intuitive to me. > > > > > > So for completeness what your saying is that you think > > > yum clean packages should clean all packages from all enabled and > > > disabled repos by default? > > > > > > and yum clean headers should clean all headers from all enabled and > > > disabled repos by default? > > > > Well, I actually think it should. > > Seriously? That seems completely backward to me. I guess to most of us it seems that the intuitive (expected) action is that "clean headers" would clean ALL headers regardless of repository status and similarly "clean all" would clean up everything. One question, would yum --enablerepo='*' clean all clean up everything? If the above would work, then I believe this would meet our needs. However, the man page should be updated to add this info and be clearer that only enabled repos are process by "yum clean". -- Gene -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list