On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 16:26 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 17:00 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > >> On 12/5/05, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <d.jacobfeuerborn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Not sure if I should file a bug or if I'm doing something wrong on my end? > >> bug already reported to the lists repeatedly, and reported in bugzilla > >> and the fix should be in rawhide "soon" since the fc4 test update > >> that fixes this already exists. > >> > >> work-around for now remove all the files named "cachecookie" in your > >> /var/cache/yum tree > >> or wait 8 hours for the cookies to expire. > > > > jef, > > > > I know you're trying to help (and your help is appreciated), but at this > > point, it's probably better to just respond to these messages with > > 'solution already discussed' and 'search the archives'. > > > > This forces the individual asking the question to learn how to search > > the archives, rather than just asking. > > > > Personally, I'm sick of the number of times this question has been > > asked. Seriously fed up. I'm a patient person, and I don't mind a > > little repetition, but in this case the solution exists in a number of > > emails both on test-list and devel-list and the problem is related to > > the basic update mechanism for fedora - yum, so in my opinion, this is > > something that everyone on the list should just read. Yum is (like it > > or not) core funcationality for fedora, so if you're not paying > > attention to what's happening to yum, or kernels, or the likes then you > > don't get to ask the same question for the 20th time. > > > > Sorry if this is a little harsh, but we're about to get back into test > > releases which means having people ask the same questions over and over > > and over (etc) because it's easier than actually reading the list they > > are subscribed to, or searching the archives. > > > > > > R. > > > > Look, I searched on both bugzilla and in the devel archives. I failed to > see the bug in bugzilla, my bad, I'm an idiot. However I do read the devel > list daily and cannot remember reading anything about this problem. > Searching for "repomd.xml" lists exactly two mails as of now, my own and > one reply. Searching for "cachecookie" (once you actually now this has > something to do with "cachecookie") lists three mails, two replies to this > thread and the latest rawhide report showing that this was fixed. > I tried to find, failed, and will now accept my shame and commit seppuku. > > Having said that I think on a public mailing-list you will simply have to > live with the imperfection of human beeings. I promise I'll search more > thoroughly the next time but even then I cannot provide you with a > guarantee that I will always be successfull. While I see that this kind of > stuff can be annoying I cannot understand why someone can get so wound up > about it. It was just a mail. > > Sorry, > Dennis Mea Culpa. I was having a bad day yesterday and I just flipped a little. I'm usually more patient. sorry. Rodd -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
