On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 17:00 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 12/5/05, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <d.jacobfeuerborn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not sure if I should file a bug or if I'm doing something wrong on my end? > > bug already reported to the lists repeatedly, and reported in bugzilla > and the fix should be in rawhide "soon" since the fc4 test update > that fixes this already exists. > > work-around for now remove all the files named "cachecookie" in your > /var/cache/yum tree > or wait 8 hours for the cookies to expire. jef, I know you're trying to help (and your help is appreciated), but at this point, it's probably better to just respond to these messages with 'solution already discussed' and 'search the archives'. This forces the individual asking the question to learn how to search the archives, rather than just asking. Personally, I'm sick of the number of times this question has been asked. Seriously fed up. I'm a patient person, and I don't mind a little repetition, but in this case the solution exists in a number of emails both on test-list and devel-list and the problem is related to the basic update mechanism for fedora - yum, so in my opinion, this is something that everyone on the list should just read. Yum is (like it or not) core funcationality for fedora, so if you're not paying attention to what's happening to yum, or kernels, or the likes then you don't get to ask the same question for the 20th time. Sorry if this is a little harsh, but we're about to get back into test releases which means having people ask the same questions over and over and over (etc) because it's easier than actually reading the list they are subscribed to, or searching the archives. R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
