Re: yum plugin suggestion or yum change?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 19:18 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> There wouldn't have been any "bickering" in the first place if instead
> of insisting partial updates were the wrong thing to do people had
> admitted at once the real problem was lack of coders. There's no shame
> in saying you have no time/you're not interested in doing something.
> OTOH when you trumpet formal opposition to something, do expect people
> to argue with you.

Asking somebody to code it up isn't saying that it is right.  However
what we think is right shouldn't prevent others from producing code to
do it anyway.  Users can make their own choice.  Yum developers have
made the choice by not putting code for it in yum itself.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating



-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux