On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 16:54 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Well, w/o even testing the repo and its contents how can you make a > statement on whether and which packages are unneccessary updates, and > whether or not stability of your system is at stake? So it seems things have changed since I last tried ATrpms in the FC3 days. Back then, every rpm seemed to dep on an atrpms package, which in turn depd on a lot of core replacements. This doesn't seem to be the case anymore. This is why I made the disclaimer that I hadn't tried atrpms in a while. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list