Re: What about smartpm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 13:27 -0800, Tim Fenn wrote:
> > Yeah, and this is still unsafe, because downgrading is inherently,
> > implicitly unsafe.
> > 
> > 1. You can downgrade into a vulnerability
> > 2. Downgrading often breaks, since newer version can do things in %post
> > that make downgrading to a workable state impossible
> > 
> 
> Can I not reverse this argument to state:
> 
> Yeah, and this is still unsafe, because upgrading is inherently,
> implicitly unsafe.
> 
> 1. you can upgrade into a vulnerability
> 2. upgrading often breaks, since newer versions can do things in %pre
> that make upgrading to a workable state impossible.
> 
> And have it be equally valid?  ;)

No.

-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
McGill University WSG
Montréal, Québec

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux