Re: What about smartpm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 08:55 -0800, MJang wrote:
>> 
>> A couple of months ago, I was under the impression that all the distros
>> were moving in that direction, as Smartpm can handle upgrades to both
>> RPMs and DEBs and can work from all kinds of repositories (apt, yum,
>> urpmi, slack, etc.). Is Smartpm still under consideration for FC5?
> 
> As far as I know, no.  Duplicate functionality.  Fedora doesn't use apt,
> no need to worry about that from a Fedora standpoint.  Fedora uses yum,
> yum cli updates, pup graphically updates.
> 

Partially true - but yum is smart, and smart is smarter.

For example, just this morning yum quit updating.  I don't recall the
details, but I had installed videolan-client from dries yum repos, and an
update of one of it's depends (from a different repo) broke it.

yum was stymied.

smart just offered to downgrade the depend, and happily fixed it.


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux