Le mardi 29 novembre 2005 à 11:37 -0800, Michael A. Peters a écrit : > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 19:16 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > The problem is not what systems have DVD burners now. > > The problem is what systems won't have DVD burners by the time the > > single-CD FC ISO goal is achieved. > > I don't think it will be achieved. I think systems won't have DVD burners by the time the single-CD FC ISO goal is achieved. Because by the time it's achieved, DVD will be old news. (should have been more clear in my message) So my goals would be to : 1. make a kick-ass network boot iso 2. reduce package interdependencies and make network install smarter so this iso can pull *small* sets of packages from the *large* FC pool. In the last releases anaconda accrued a deplorable tendency to install everything available all in the name of simplifying installation/anaconda coding and reducing the number of possible RHEL support scenarii. Unfortunately that means network installation bloat has grown much faster than the FC ISO enveloppe. Focusing on the ISO number is very wrong - will a two-CD FC that forces you to install pretty much everything be so much better for small systems than a 4-CD base from which you can build a 1 CD system ? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
