> AT> And if you don't trust repo X to replace package Y, then why trust > AT> it to offer package Z? Better drop repo X, if you feel > AT> uncomfortable. > > I would drop atrpms in an instant if anyone else provided those kernel > modules. However, noone else does. Atrpms is only usable for me with a > hefty exclude= line, and I'm seriously considering switching to > include=. However, that would mean never again being able to check > with yum whether atrpms provides a certain package. livna carries those modules. Well, to be clear ipw2200 is just firmware - the module is in the kernel package. > Perhaps the real solution is an option to let yum list ignore exlude= and > include=. no, that's not the answer. Talk about counterintuitive. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
