On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 14:24 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > 2005/11/29, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@xxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:44 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 14:15 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit : > > > > > > > The question is why are these pieces of software in Fedora CORE vs > > > > Fedora EXTRAS. I don't think anybody is complaining that the software > > > > is a part of the Fedora Project itself, just where they should land. > > > > Core or Extras. > > > > > > Actually I for example don't use KDE, and don't care if it's in core or > > > extras. > > > > > > What I do care about is Gnome depending on arts. > > > > Unless it has changed - the only reason Gnome depends upon arts is one > > single gstreamer plugin. > > > > I filed an RFE to have it split into a separate package awhile ago (I > > think pre FC3) and was told it wasn't worth it - even though without > > that plugin, I wouldn't need either arts or qt (both of which I never > > use) > > whats the bugzilla id? this sounds like "definitely worth it" to me. Whoa - first time ever I have found a closed bug I looked for on the first search. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=135841 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
