2005/11/29, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@xxxxxxx>: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 23:44 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le lundi 28 novembre 2005 à 14:15 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit : > > > > > The question is why are these pieces of software in Fedora CORE vs > > > Fedora EXTRAS. I don't think anybody is complaining that the software > > > is a part of the Fedora Project itself, just where they should land. > > > Core or Extras. > > > > Actually I for example don't use KDE, and don't care if it's in core or > > extras. > > > > What I do care about is Gnome depending on arts. > > Unless it has changed - the only reason Gnome depends upon arts is one > single gstreamer plugin. > > I filed an RFE to have it split into a separate package awhile ago (I > think pre FC3) and was told it wasn't worth it - even though without > that plugin, I wouldn't need either arts or qt (both of which I never > use) whats the bugzilla id? this sounds like "definitely worth it" to me. > > > > > I'd rather people spent more time untangling this kind of stupid > > cross-dependencies than arguing what needs to be made second-class > > citizen. > > Modularization hopefully will fix that - if it is applied to things like > gstreamer plugins (which is where the arts is pulled in) > > Some other apps (ie mplayer in livna) also want it - but only because > they are generic onesizefitsall builds, due to a lack of a proper plugin > architecture (like gstreamer provides) > > If you really want the qt/arts cross dependency from gnome removed - > file a bug with gstreamer-plugins. > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
