On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:08:28PM +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: > > > > > It would be very nice if one of the update utilities could be set to > > > ignore updates across repositories. I.e. if I've installed foo from > > > core and bar from atrpms and atrpms has newer versions of both foo and > > > bar, only bar gets updated. > > > > smart can do exactly that. > > You can use the sha/md5sum digest info to match between the rpms > installed in rpmdb (/var/lib/rpm/) and the rpm packages from the > repositories. This will only work if the repos still have the older > rpms listed though. Most repos purge the old rpms, and even updates-released does so every now and then. Why not use the signature or other meta- data like vendor to map packages to origin? > Is smart storing addon information in its own database? No, no history information. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpRcIr9l16dy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
