seth vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > B/c of the rapidly evolving nature of the gcj and related java tools, > what if we moved them to extras so that work on those packages could be > both public and move faster? > > It would be a big savings on the size of core and it seems like adding > those packages over there would be the most correct as the java packages > don't really have any necessary reason to be in core. > > What do you think? Splitting GCJ itself off from the complier wouldn't really work well. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
