On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, at 12:16 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > * support for signing with Sequoia-sq as an alternative to GnuPG >> >> Is this not already supported in the current RPM? I seem to remember dealing with issues due to us using sequoia-sq and it being stricter with some non compliant signatures on third party packages signed with other cryptographic libraries > > Are you maybe mixing up signature verification (which uses rpm-sequoia > since a few releases back) and actually producing signed RPMs? > Ah, that’s it, thanks -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 README: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
