On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:41:31PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally everything needed by Fedora infrastructure is in Fedora itself, it took us a few years to get there with mailman so the earlier we start the better > > > > Yes indeed, starting now would allow us to start on the right foot. Yes. Normal packaging should be a requirement for tools that are expected to be used by the standard Fedora packager or for Fedora infrastracture. For two separate reasons: - that software is easier to use and deploy, in particular to keep updated. - passing through a packaging review is a proof of minimal quality of the software. Going through the steps for packaging will uncover possible license problems, emedded libraries, and other shenanigans that might not go unnoticed as long as some build&deployment script is being used. And we want to get this info _before_ we commit to the tool. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
