On 2/28/25 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 08:56:33AM -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> On 2/13/25 3:32 AM, Clement Verna wrote: >> >>> Given our experience running these tests, we would like to propose making the coreos.cosa.build-and-testa required gate for package updates in rawhide. We've already been successfully gating packages owned by the Fedora CoreOS working group [3], and we'd like to extend this requirement to the broader package set defined here [4]. > > I think the general response in the previous discussion was > "cautious, but positive". Please just make a formal proposal (*) > and let's move on with this. > > Zbyszek > > (*) FESCo would be one option. I don't think we have a more authoritative body > specialized for QA. Or just open a pull request for the gating config. But > I expect that that'd get bounced back to FESCo anyway, so it probably makes > sense to do the PR and FESCo ticket in parallel. Thanks! Will take this to FESCO. Dusty -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
