On Thursday, 20 February 2025 17:15:20 CET Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 2:31 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thank you. Would you please update tree-sitter, emacs, etc. in a side > > tag next time? > > Except you didn't. Emacs is again broken in Rawhide due to a > tree-sitter update. Meaning I can't do the work I was planning to do > this morning because the build I am working on BuildRequires emacs. > Do you not understand why using a side tag is a good idea? Do you not > understand how to use a side tag? I'm happy to walk you through the > answers to either question if lack of education is the issue here. It was built in a side tag, but the emacs and neovim builds were triggered to early so the packages got built against the old libtree-sitter version in the side tag. See also the comments at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-b594b1ea02 We wouldn't have that problem if the Fedora build service would detect a new version and rebuild the dependencies. SUSE solved that problem **more than a decade ago**: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Build_Service Cheers Andreas -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
