On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 07:32:49PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 28. 01. 25 v 19:18 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): ...snip... > > Mass rebuilding which? Rawhide or the new branched? Or both? > > > I am talking about Rawhide > > > > rawhide would be fine, but all those changes would have to be made again > > in branched when found. > > > Are you speaking about changes due to updated toolchain? As I elaborated > elsewhere, I don't think they need to be fixed. I'll disagree. If there's some toolchain changes that break the build, it's much better to know about it and able able to address it instead of finding out when you are trying to push out an urgent fix or change and find that your build doesn't work. > Do we actually know what percentage of packages is touched after branching? > One might argue that doing the mass rebuild after branching would increase > the number, but I don't think it would change anything. I believe that only > the relevant changes would be backported when needed. I have no such stats. I guess you could pull that from git? kevin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
