On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:37:07PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:12:32PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:51:16PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > In accordance with https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/, > > > I plan to do a "mass package change" to add sysusers.d config files for all packages > > > which currently call 'useradd' and 'groupadd' and drop the calls to > > > getent/id/useradd/groupadd/usermod/gpasswd. > > > > > > This is part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers. > > > Latest build of rpm will autocreate users and groups for all packages that > > > contain a sysusers.d config file. This means that, for those packages, we can drop > > > the scriptlets that do that. In fact, rpm will do this unconditionally, so the > > > scriptlets which are executed later are now noops and having them in the spec file > > > is unnecessary and confusing. > > > > This indicates the required support in RPM is present for version 4.20, > > which is the version already available in Fedora 41, and looking at > > old F41 builds I'm seeing the virtual provides already being added > > > > eg https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/libvirt/10.6.0/6.fc41/data/logs/x86_64/build.log > > > > Provides: config(libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu) = 10.6.0-6.fc41 group(kvm) = ZyBrdm0gMzYA group(qemu) group(qemu) = ZyBxZW11IDEwNwAA groupmember(qemu/kvm) = bSBxZW11IGt2bQAA libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu = 10.6.0-6.fc41 libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu(x86-64) = 10.6.0-6.fc41 libvirt_driver_qemu.so()(64bit) user(qemu) = dSBxZW11IDEwNzpxZW11ICJxZW11IHVzZXIiIC0gLQAA > > > > does this mean that the %post scripts for useradd were already obsolete > > in Fedora 41, or was there some aspect that was NOT enabled, despite > > the virtual Provides being added ? > > The actual creation of the accounts was not enabled in F41. > The commit to enable that only went in about a week ago > in rawhide: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/c/8649a762c59ef03fab557cae6c1de9579d84e73f. > (And it _is_ somewhat experimental. We're targeting F42 for the availibility > of the mechanisms, but F43 for the actual switch of all packages.) Hmm, so I'm confused now. The top message of yours above indicates the intention to do a "mass package change" for sysusers, which I assumed to mean convert everything in F42, but here you indicate F43 ? If I'm removing %post scripts manually is it valid to do it in F42, or should we wait till F43 ? With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
