Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.15.2 [was Re: Fedora Linux f42 Mass Rebuild is finished]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There was some kind of a temporary/transient failure in a part of the OpenQA tests where a web browser loads accounts.fedoraproject.org. (These OpenQA tests are mandatory since abseil-cpp is a critpath package.) These tests finally passed after re-triggering them twice, and the update[1] is now in Rawhide.

I said earlier that I would also take care of rebuilding ceph after the other builds reached Rawhide, but a scratch build[2] failed for reasons unrelated to gtest,

In file included from /usr/include/lttng/tracepoint-rcu.h:10,
                 from /usr/include/lttng/tracepoint.h:13,
                 from /builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-19.2.0-build/ceph-19.2.0/redhat-linux-build/include/tracing/mgroprequest.h:11,                  from /builddir/build/BUILD/ceph-19.2.0-build/ceph-19.2.0/src/tracing/mgroprequest.c:5: /usr/include/urcu/compiler.h:51:4: error: #error "URCU was configured to use atomic builtins, but this toolchain does not support them."    51 | #  error "URCU was configured to use atomic builtins, but this toolchain does not support them."
      |    ^~~~~

so I am not going to attempt a rebuild or even push a commit for the rebuild, because I don’t want to accidentally make things harder for ceph’s maintainers.

Therefore ceph and libcamera remain as the two packages that couldn’t be rebuilt – for reasons specific to those two packages – and they will need to be investigated by their regular maintainers.

[1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-5041b6b575

[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128368059

On 1/23/25 1:31 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 21:35 +0100, Ben Beasley wrote:
I just merged the side tag as:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7d2ef14400
	Hi,
thank you for stepping in so quickly. The update is "stuck", I guess
due to the rpminspect discovering some ABI changes in the abseil-cpp.

Could someone flush it, thus the other packages can be built, please?

	Thanks and bye,
	Milan

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux