Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.15.2 [was Re: Fedora Linux f42 Mass Rebuild is finished]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I understand the suggestion to build directly in Rawhide since things are already broken. On the other hand, I’ve already started building in f42-build-side-104083. I’ll compromise as follows: I will finish building everything but ceph, merge the side tag, and then rebuild ceph directly in rawhide, since ceph is by far the slowest rebuild involved. That should speed things up by many hours.

On 1/22/25 2:22 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 13:35 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
Correction: the breaking update was built into side tag
f42-build-side-99460 soon after it was committed, but the side tag
was
never merged. And it’s possible that the update was coordinated three
months ago, and I just don’t remember.
The sidetag  f42-build-side-99460 was deleted.

Since gtest 1.15.2 is already in rawhide , we don't need build the
other package in a sidetag (IMHO)

Best regards and thank you .


On 1/22/25 1:31 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like the breaking update in question was committed three
months ago,

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest/c/24e4a26153b73a97db5c86109363662636235452?branch=rawhide

but never announced, coordinated, or built until the mass rebuild
came
along.

I’m going to do a quick COPR test in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/music/gtest1.15/ to see if
there are API compatibility issues (which, if serious, might imply
the
new gtest/gmock might need to be untagged), or whether simply
rebuilding dependent packages will resolve the issues.

If just rebuilding everything in a new side tag turns out to be
workable, then I’m happy to take care of it. I maintain or co-
maintain
several of the impacted packages anyway.

On 1/22/25 11:47 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 16:21 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-
announce
wrote:
there are 1875 failed builds
that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
     Hi,
am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some
middle
time
of the merge of the rebuild tag into the rawhide? The build
[1]
fails
on package dependencies involving libphonenumber, abseil-cpp-
devel,
libgtest and libgmock. I do not recall when I saw any such
package
dependency problem on rawhide the last time.
     Bye,
     Milan

[1]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128295398

we need rebuild these package:

dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --whatrequires "libgtest.so*" --
sourcerpm
-q | pkgname
abseil-cpp
ceph
davix
gfal2
gtest
libcamera
mir
pkcs11test
python-steps
wlcs

dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide --whatrequires "libgmock.so*" --
sourcerpm
-q | pkgname
   abseil-cpp
ceph
gtest
mir
wlcs


--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux