Re: Idea proposal for next mass rebuilds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 3:11 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The code gathers the necessary information to do sequenced builds,
> though. Since it can report the graph to you, that means it can
> theoretically use that information to sort build sequencing.

Ok, it *has* dependency graph data, but it doesn't *do* anything with
it other than computing an integer "priority" based on which packages
in the graph changed.

The problem is that 1) that graph is incomplete (anything beyond depth
4 is lumped together into "base buildroot or something else"), and 2)
it doesn't have *any* data for any build done in an on-demand side-tag
due to the way it collects the buildroot contents (*after* the build
is tagged as "stable", at which point the buildroot has already long
been cleaned up).

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux