On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 7:33 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 1:26 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We should also be able to do dependency sequenced rebuilds. It's not > > like it hasn't been done before (see openSUSE's Open Build Service > > with perl-BSSolv and our Koschei with DNF). It would be nice if we > > could do it for mass builds too (or really any time we need rebuild > > sequences, regardless if they're partial or full ones). > > koschei does nothing of the sort. > > It resolves dependencies and drift between current buildroot and the > buildroot of the last real and / or scratch build, but that > information is only used to prioritize which package to submit a > scratch build for next (i.e. which package had the biggest "dependency > drift" since the last build. There is no dependency graph / > topological sort involved at all, it's just "highest priority gets a > new scratch build first". > The code gathers the necessary information to do sequenced builds, though. Since it can report the graph to you, that means it can theoretically use that information to sort build sequencing. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
