On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there > used to be some guideline suggesting form such as > `pagkage-name-version-description-of-patch.patch`. But I was not able to > find this codified in guidelines. I recollect such naming rule, too. But I cannot find it in guidelines now. Maybe that was a rule in `rpmlint`? Anyway, even if there is such rule, it is not easily googlable or written in naming guidelines in Fedora docs. So we can assume it does not exist. -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Baron Vladimir Harkonnen -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
