Re: F42 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 / x86_64 Architecture (v2) (self-contained)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 07:08:05PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> > > For stuff installed into /usr, we
> > > should just allow packages to be optionally built with the higher
> > > microarchitecture level in addition to the base one and allow DNF to
> > > sort and prefer packages accordingly.
> >
> > Is this not just resurrecting the old i386/i586/i686 RPM handling?  Is
> > there a reason not to do it the same way again?
> 
> Not that I know of. The logic is also already kind of there. The
> x86_64 arch levels are supported as distinct architectures in RPM with
> compatibility detection. openSUSE is already using this facility.

FWIW, I noticed that AlmaLinux Kitten 10 is shipping with two distinct
full builds of the distro:

 - RPM arch "x86_64"

   The default arch built for x86_64-v3 ABI, matching CentOS Stream 10
   / future RHEL-10

 - RPM arch "x86_64_v2"

   The optional arch built for x86_64-v2 ABI, matching the ABI baseline
   from CentOS Stream 9 / RHEL-9

I've not tried them, but I'm assuming neither of these are parallel
installable, with the choice fixed at provisioning time.

With regards,
Daniel

[1] https://almalinux.org/blog/2024-10-22-introducing-almalinux-os-kitten/
    https://kitten.repo.almalinux.org/10-kitten/BaseOS/
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux