On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 3:40 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 18. 12. 24 v 2:25 odp. Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a): > > If there are several co-maintainers, which one do you choose? > > Anyone. That's literally the worst way to handle this IMO. Packages that get orphaned due to long-standing "issues" (FTI / FTBFS) means that *all* co-maintainers have failed to address these issues - *all* of them should have been CC'd on the corresponding bugs and reminders. Promoting any one of them to "main" maintainer just to keep the package from being retired just prolongs the time frame in which a broken package is present in Fedora. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
