Dne 16. 12. 24 v 11:17 dop. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
By all means have personal preferences, but if someone is following
documented Fedora procedures that should be considered fine, even if
it doesn't align with personal preferences.
PPs must state why they want PP status [1]. I always thought that they should only use PP rights for that reason only
[2]. For example, if they get rights as a rel-eng team member to do a mass rebuild, they should just bump the release
and add a changelog entry. They shouldn't do any other modifications in dist-git: changing .gitignore, converting to
%autospec, using macros... They should use PR for that like everyone else. Or ask FESCO to allow them to use PP rights
for general tweaking of SPEC files.
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/#_becoming_provenpackager
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/
"They should be careful not to change other people’s packages needlessly and try to do the minimal changes
required to fix problems"
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
