> Am 03.12.2024 um 21:50 schrieb pgnd <pgnd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> To clarify: > > thanks! > >> However, OpenDMARC remains a widely used package, > > likely quite true. > >> and I believe it still provides value to Fedora users. > > as long as it's well maintained, and not wholly dependent on an absent/abandoned upstream, then +1 In Fedora, we urgently need dmarc / dkim capabilities. Without those you can’t set up a usable mailserver nowadays. And mailservice is a core service of Fedora Server. The current package works fine as far as I use it. > >> - I am not aware of any actively maintained forks of OpenDMARC, nor >> any distributions currently sourcing from such forks. Please, correct >> if I'm wrong so I can check status. > > tbh, i stopped using it long ago, not least because of the non-response from upstream. > i use different solutions, and generally recommend same. so really can't say what's managed where, and by whom. iirc Arch and Debian both pkg it (?); what source(s) they use, i just dunno. What did you use instead of OpenDMARC? Maybe a bit off topic here: What about the OpenDKIM package? If I remember correctly, it was orphaned, too. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy PBoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora Docs team contributor and board member Java developer and enthusiast -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
