Re: protobuf: too old and too new, how to move forward?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 11:14 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There seems to be an issue that is stalled with respect to the protobuf
> version packaged in fedora:
> 
> See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/28
> 
> Updating it breaks stuff, but keeping it at the current old version also
> breaks stuff.
> 
> One solution is to create two versions, as offered in the PR above, but
> this has not seen any action yet.

I'd say the maintainer should pick whether they want to maintain the
newer or older version, and whichever 'camp' wants the opposite should
then take the responsibility of creating the other-versioned package
with the variant name.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.happyassassin.net




-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux