Re: Looking for advice on packaging newer version of ncdu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> On 22. Nov 2024, at 13:29, Richard Fearn <richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is being advertised as the "main" version these days (whereas the 1.x C version is described as "LTS" and "Lags a bit behind on the 2.x version"). So it feels like I should create a new "ncdu1" package for the 1.x version, and the existing ncdu package can become 2.x.

My vote would be to replace it with https://github.com/dundee/gdu, which has the same interface, is optimized for SSDs, and does not come with the Zig dependency.

I’ve been using that for quite a while now and I don’t miss ncdu at all.


-- 
Clemens Lang
RHEL Crypto Team
Red Hat

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux