On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:29:26PM +0000, Richard Fearn wrote: > ncdu is a text-mode disk usage analyzer: https://dev.yorhel.nl/ncdu > > There's a new Zig version (2.x) which I would like to also package. 2.x is > being advertised as the "main" version these days (whereas the 1.x C > version is described as "LTS" and "Lags a bit behind on the 2.x version"). > So it feels like I should create a new "ncdu1" package for the 1.x version, > and the existing ncdu package can become 2.x. > > > * Call the 1.x binary "ncdu1"? > * Or call the 2.x binary "ncdu2"? (doesn't seem appropriate for what is now > the "main" version) > * Or keep both binaries called "ncdu" (packages will conflict)? > * Use alternatives to allow both to be installed with "ncdu" pointing to > one of them? I don't see the point of keeping ncdu1 at all. v2 seem to be feature-complete comparing to v1. There are caveats about Zig (the language) not being stable, but it doesn't matter for endusers. -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Baron Vladimir Harkonnen -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
